Up Sucker Creek

Up Sucker Creek
Photo Courtesy of the Lake Oswego Library

Monday, March 17, 2014

The Case for Cul-de-Sacs

The much-aligned cul-de-sac - the suburban form urban planners love to hate - is given a huge thumbs up for the social connectedness it creates for the people who live in them.  The suburbs are  "Connected Communities" - but it's not for everyone.  

The Case for Cul-de-Sacs 

The Atlantic Cities   EMILY BADGER  OCT 17, 2013


In a weird way, Thomas R. Hochschild Jr. actually first encountered the social cohesion of cul-de-sacs in his latest research when he wandered into one in Connecticut with his clipboard and polo shirt, and someone called the cops.
That never happened on the other types of streets he was studying, places where it would turn out the neighbors didn't know each other as well, and it was less clear who "belonged." Repeatedly, though, he found at the end of cul-de-sacs families who watched each others' children and took in each others' mail, who barbequed and orchestrated the removal of snow together, and who considered each other close friends. In cul-de-sacs, these families had a stronger sense of shared social space and territoriality. An outsider stood out.
In sociologist's terms, Hochschild ultimately concluded that people who live in traditional bulb cul-de-sacs have the highest levels of attitudinal and behavioral cohesion (covering both how they feel about their neighbors and how much they actually interact with them). People who live on your average residential through-street have the lowest levels (in between the two are "dead-end" cul-de-sacs that lack that traditional, circular social space).  

Continue reading at The Atlantic Cities.

No comments:

Post a Comment