Up Sucker Creek

About the future of Lake Oswego and suburbs everywhere.

Up Sucker Creek

Up Sucker Creek
Photo Courtesy of the Lake Oswego Library

Saturday, May 3, 2014

What Portland will look like

A great article in the current issue Portland Monthly magazine gives a detailed look at development scheduled to go up in Portland in the near future.  Coupled with the spurt of development driven by low vacancy rates and rising rents in close-in Portland, developers now have a good market that supports building apartments.  Soon the market will be overbuilt and the bubble will burst, just as it did for condos, but for now, the boom is on.

The new construction is not cheap and will necessarily be in the luxury class or near to it.  But renters will not be buying space as much as location.  This is one reason young people generally move out of the downtown area when they settle down and raise children - more space, good schools, and a back yard.  Notice too that parking is extremely limited - less than 1 space per unit, and usually those are an extra cost.

On the page "North Pearl: Going Up?" notice the size of the apartment buildings.  All but the tall towers are already, or may be approved under new codes in Lake Oswego.  The question is, what will Lake Oswego look and feel like?  How many more people would be added to an already built-out city?  And, is this what citizens want?  If not, let your City Council know so they can provide direction to the Planning Staff to change course and deliver a product that is more in keeping with what the community wants.  I heard a lot of people say 3 stories max. in the East End, with the 4th as an exception if done right is about right.  With a single word change in the code, 5 stories might be a new height instead.  I don't think more than a handful of people know that there is a max. height of 158' along the Kruse Way corridor.

The point is to make Lake Oswego the way regular Lake Oswegans want, not the way the planning theorists say we should live.  And, oh yeah, if someone tries to tell you we need to comply with rules that allow for this type of density, we don't.  Our current codes and zones meet all the state requirements now and can provide housing for the next 20 years as required.  But where do we stop?

It's our city after all. 

Plotting Portland's New Skyline


*Led by chief planner Joe Zehnder, Portland’s Bureau of Planning and Sustainability created this diagram for its Central City 2035 effort to envision a “Center of Innovation and Exchange.” The vision is still in progress. To find out more, go to portlandoregon.gov/bps. 



Lloyd District: Ecotopia


With a new lush public plaza and major face-lift for the aging mall, Portland’s first “ecodistrict” will be a lean, green, sustainable machine.
Published Apr 2, 2014, 9:00am
By Randy Gragg


Posted by Up Sucker Creek at 4:41 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

2 comments:

  1. UnknownMay 4, 2014 at 10:21 AM

    Very timely with code changes underway!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Up Sucker CreekMay 8, 2014 at 7:52 PM

    The biggest immediate threat is the Annual Code Updates, or "Housekeeping." Changes in wording can usher in 4-story buildings in downtown without a review by the DRC, the City Council or anyone. If it's in the codes, there's not much you can do about it. But who writes the codes but the people who interpret, administer and enforce them. The Fourth Branch of Government rules the city.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blogs and Websites of Interest

  • Cafe Hayek
  • Capital Research Center
  • Christopher F. Rufo
  • FiveThirtyEight
  • Foundation for Economic Education
  • Freakonomics
  • Hit and Run
  • Newgeography.com - Economic, demographic, and political commentary about places
  • PragerU
  • Rational Optimist | Blog by Matt Ridley
  • Reason Foundation
  • The American Mind
  • The Antiplanner
  • The Grumpy Economist
  • The Manhattan Institute
  • The New City
  • The People's Cube - News - Digest
Show 10 Show All

Blog Archive

  • ►  2023 (1)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  2022 (116)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (13)
    • ►  May (6)
    • ►  April (14)
    • ►  March (19)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2021 (42)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (12)
    • ►  October (16)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (1)
  • ►  2017 (69)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (22)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2016 (137)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (23)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  August (11)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (13)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (13)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ►  2015 (235)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (15)
    • ►  August (25)
    • ►  July (27)
    • ►  June (14)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (28)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (42)
  • ▼  2014 (547)
    • ►  December (40)
    • ►  November (33)
    • ►  October (61)
    • ►  September (48)
    • ►  August (51)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (44)
    • ▼  May (50)
      • Townhouses in Toowoomba
      • One world, millions of stereotypes
      • Three to read in the Review
      • Notice of Public Hearing for Sale of City Property
      • Redacted - Part 2
      • Still true after 7 years. Thank you Bob
      • Housekeeping
      • Beauty not beast
      • Is this the problem?
      • X
      • Redacted
      • CC road funding options
      • "What starts here changes the world"
      • 'Seeing Flowers'
      • Reminder of Public Hearing on Codes this week
      • Redevelopment Resurrection?
      • If you don't already know what you're looking for...
      • Urban-rural divide
      • Kessi's hired guns
      • Anyone home at City Hall?
      • From our friends in Sydney, Australia
      • Suburbs regain their appeal
      • A 10-mile toxic float trip
      • Who creates policy in Lake Oswego?
      • Fees bite into budgets
      • To brighten your day
      • 'What's the Worst That Can Happen?'
      • Gentrification is nobody's friend
      • New and improved Wizer block?
      • Streamlining small towns into monsters
      • Et tu Tualatin?
      • Sim City (It can't happen here!)
      • Under the radar
      • First up: Annual Code Updates
      • Code Updates: Dates you should know
      • Today: Community Development Codes (SmartCodes?)
      • Wish you were there
      • Thursday will change this town forever
      • Tonight. This one's a doozy
      • Tiny spaces squeeze parking
      • This is Public Involvement in Lake Oswego
      • Another plan to review... but be quick about it!
      • It comes from near and far
      • Speaking of codes...
      • Trouble in river city - Infill
      • More fat to trim
      • New phrase, same thing
      • Playing with numbers - it's no game
      • Do you know the numbers?
      • What Portland will look like
    • ►  April (51)
    • ►  March (45)
    • ►  February (44)
    • ►  January (48)
  • ►  2013 (173)
    • ►  December (55)
    • ►  November (56)
    • ►  October (48)
    • ►  September (14)

Wikipedia

Search results

Search This Blog

Email

upsuckercreek@gmail.com
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.