At what point do mandatory "fees" based on assessed property values become property taxes? What happened to the property tax limit of 3% per year? And how can the county determine the number of vehicle trips per property when comparing differing car ownership and personal driving habits? An average number of vehicle trips per property type that does not account for actual usage is unfair. Aren't these just another formula to tax property while calling it something else? And shouldn't the public have an opportunity to vote on new or increased taxes on their property?
In their Transportation Services Plan (part of the county's comp plan amendments) the county speaks truthfully: "Use all financial means possible and take the lead in developing new funding sources to construct needed projects." Chapter 5, Transportation, Pg. V-4, General Transportation Goals.
Sample charts of fees based on funding types appears as Attachment-A to the Staff Report for the Commission's work session on Tuesday. As you look at the numbers, remember that they are monthly fees, not annual.
Seven Basicl Sources of Revenue
for County Road Maintenance
-
– Federal revenue
-
– County Road Fund
-
– Special state revenue programs
-
– Local governments and other agencies
-
– Other revenue sources – County-conditioned, developer-financed
improvements
-
– Transportation System Development Charges (TSDCs)
-
– Urban Renewal (Tax Increment Financing [TIF]
No comments:
Post a Comment